this is another letter of complaint from my website of (homo)sexual assault that is
"When I'm hungry, I eat. When I'm thirsty, I drink. When I feel like saying something, I say it." - Madonna
back to the menu
dear sir or vagina:

it rubs the lotion on its skin, or else it gets the hose again

it is illegal in new sewickley township to commit acts of rape (or any other acts of violence) against members of the lesser gender. i believe that members of the shorter/smaller/weaker gender are being placated by society's use of the word "Strongwoman," as well as the phrase "a woman can do anything a man can do," and it is for this reason that i have become an advocate for and the founder of a mens' group called "Risk Affirming Patriarchal Endeavors". i won't begin to tell you of the topics discussed at our meetings, this website would be taken down if i were to name any of the past or potential victims of our patriarchal endeavors, and i certainly will not disclose any information of the mental institutions that my "traumatic brain-injury" has put me into.

it rubs the lotion on its skin, or else it gets the hose again

i may be a borderline psychopath, but it is psychopathic for society to think that there is any basis in fact to the notion of "gender equality". please tell me why these things are gender-based: sports teams, military requirements, the "coney island hot dog eating competition," the use of axes and chainsaws in lumberjack competitions. i'm sure that men don't become soldiers just sliding by with fulfillment of the physical requirements meant to compensate for females' lackluster abilities (call them disabilities). if you're a man wanting to be in the armed forces, you're going to have to be put through a LOT more than what the little females are put through.

it rubs the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again

even feminists in new sewickley township cannot achieve like a man - even feminists of the cranberry township womens' club - this is because all wombn have a body which is designed around the womb and around the concept of motherhood. i refer to members of the lesser gender as "vaginas" and "egg-bleeders" and "milk-spouters," and doing so reminds me every day of what is known as "masculine superiority" - which keeps me free from the gender-identity issues which are endorsed by today's society.

feminism is a gender-identity issue. it is a gender-identity issue to advocate for the little gender with the words "a woman can do anything a man can do". this is because anyone's gender is a matter of reality, and anyone's identity is merely a matter of self-understanding (or of self-misunderstanding). gender-identity is a matter of the understanding (or misunderstanding) of one's own gender. "a woman can do anything a man can do" is a gender-identity issue because it is based on (mis)understandings of the female gender. it is for this reason that i understand feminism as a gender-identity issue. a woman simply cannot do anything a man can do, this point is justified by every aforementioned gender-based physical well as the gender-based competitions that have slipped my mind.

it rubs the lotion on its skin, or else it gets the hose again

i may be a borderline psychopath or schizophrenic, but the inadequacies of my mental-health surely pale in comparison to the inadequacies of the mental-health of feminists. they live a lie every day, they preach their lies in schoolhouses and on television and in print. feminism is largely responsible for the degradation of society and of the family, as well as for the public's acceptance of homosexuality, given that feminism equals less importance placed on men. little boys don't one day feel an urgent longing for a relationship with a man unless there is (or has been) a masculine void in their lives. with little importance being given to men, with an egg-bleeder/milk-spouter (and all of her physical disabilities or physical weaknesses) in control of the family, of course there is going to be a masculine void felt even by a child growing up in a two-parent home. i'm not equating one-parent homes with two-parent homes, i'm just equating the damage done to a child in either home by feminism and by the vagina who robs her children of a family out of spite for the taller/broader/stronger aspect of men. out of spite for the importance of fathers.

getting back to feminism spawning dysfunctional families, getting back to the correlation of feminism and homosexuality: gay "men" are not known as "masculivoids" for no reason, gay "men" don't need a man to feel complete for no reason, gay "men" are not curious of masculinity for no reason...GAY "MEN" ARE MISSING A REAL SENSE OF MASCULINE GENDER-IDENTITY, AND THIS IS WHY THEY ARE APT TO USE MEN AS SEEING-EYE DOGS OR AS SPECIMENS TO STUDY UP-CLOSE AND WITH AS MANY OF THEIR SEVEN SENSES AS THEY CAN USE. a strong and competent father-figure is what delivers a strong sense of masculine gender-identity, and a strong and competent father-figure is what feminism won't tolerate. unless, of course, a member of the lackluster gender is using the "anything a man can do" mantra to justify her little self as the big and strong father-figure.

furthermore, in a female "father figure" exists a slight of a man, and any little boy who's looking for some masculine direction or justification is not going to find it in mere masculine histrionics. a fatherless little boy is so apt to have a slight sense of masculine esteem. it rubs the lotion on its skin. gay "men" see things queerly, not clearly. or else it gets the hose again. speaking of rubbing lotion (or doing anything) to avoid "getting the hose again" (or getting any sort of discomfort), doesn't indoctrination work in the same way? you'll love the homos and their sins, or else you'll get some coaching then. i've heard of so many people being forced to undergo coaching (or "diversity training") so that they'd think in a non-offensive manner (or in a manner that is, well, common)..but if everybody is common then nobody is "diversity training" should really be renamed to "uniformity training". diversity is lacking if everyone must share the same viewpoints, diversity is lacking if everyone is common. diversity, therefore, is what socialism lacks.

no matter if she is linda carter or rupaul, a female simply is not equipped to provide her children with the father-figure that makes a family a family. perhaps feminists or transvestites could provide their children with a dysfunctional father-figure, but don't expect children in THAT kind of "family" to grow up into adults with their heads on straight.

this site is dedicated to madonna and josh lane - i am because of you both

thank you,
dylan terreri, i
sheldon cooper, ii
"When I'm hungry, I eat. When I'm thirsty, I drink. When I feel like saying something, I say it." - Madonna

check out my site, , unless you're there now