this is another letter of complaint from my website of (homo)sexual assault that is
"When I'm hungry, I eat. When I'm thirsty, I drink. When I feel like saying something, I say it." - Madonna
back to the menu
A WOMENS' MOVEMENT IS LONG OVERDUE
dear sir or vagina:
please join the movement at www.thelessergender.com and support the ladies who take pride in NOT being manlike.
do any other females think that there is something not right about a female who can't get a sense of esteem without being regarded as "manlike".
i am starting a movement for females who love and respect femininity as the absence of masculinity that it IS, rather than as the "a woman can do anything a man can do" propaganda-line that feminists love to recite but cannot justify. feminists have no respect for the feminine gender, they have no respect for their gender being the shorter/smaller/weaker gender, they have no respect for reality or for they way things ARE. they're trying to put some kind of a spin on gender so that society regards a woman as man-like with a womb (wombman). now, i realize how the word "woman" stems from "wombman," much like "ape-" and "spider-" are both prefixes to the word "man" which differentiate the prefixed man from the actual man, but the population of vaginas all seem to want to be man's equal (even though both the bigger anatomy and the superior ability of one gender has slapped that notion of gender-equality right in the face ever since the coney island hot dog eating competition had to placate the lesser gender by adding a woman's division in order for the little gender to triumph).
i am starting a movement for females who take pride in being female. furthermore, vaginas everywhere should be OFFENDED at other vaginas who are trying to measure-up to men, but instead they take pride in it. it is disrespect towards femininity for a vagina to think that she's nothing unless she's as strong as a man. it is disrespect towards femininity for a vagina to use the "a woman can do anything a man can do" line as a pride-preserver - first because it's a lie propagated by self-discontent feminists who won't be happy until the jagged little lie of gender-equality is as accepted as alanis morissette's "jagged little pill" was in the 1990s, and second because anyone who utters that line is belittling femininity by trying to morph a masculine identity onto it.
there is something not right about a vagina who can't get a sense of esteem without being regarded as "manlike".
i am wholeheartedly OFFENDED by the excess of vaginas featured on "104.7 fm" internet talk-radio advertisements, i am offended by there being a blatant ignorance of men on television news-shows as if to suggest that the shorter/smaller/weaker gender of masculine wannabees has some kind of superiority over men. i don't want to hear a bunch of egg-bleeding vaginas sitting in a coffee-klatch and speaking their opinions on important things - they are bimbos, from whoopi goldberg to barbara walters to andrea tantaros to kimberly guilfoyle. people who were designed to bleed eggs and to spout milk should NOT be looked up to - this is because they are merely tools to be used by men for pro-creation, they are tools to be used by babies for nourishment. that's all they are, they should NOT be regarded as an authority on ANYTHING, they should NOT be looked up to by little boys who will eventually have no choice but to look down upon all women who don't wear high-heeled shoes.
men are taller, men are broader, men are stronger, men are hungrier, men are hornier. regarding vagina-people: whether or not 1) the wannabees wear high-heeled shoes to be as tall as men, 2) the wannabees wear shoulder-pads to make their shoulders as broad as mens', or c) the wannabees go to a vaginas-only exercise facility which lacks man-sized barbells and any other inkling of masculine superiority, the fact remains that masculinity is the physically-superior gender. people who cannot accept this, namely feminists, are lying to themselves. women should not be seen as heros, they should not be seen as father-figures, single-parent households are as wrong as the notion of gender-equality. women should not be seen as heros because (aside from laying an egg every month and spurting milk from their MOMmary glands) they are not men and they cannot achieve like men (refer to your GENDER-BASED physical competitions which actually suggest that having a vagina on a team full of men would be regarded as a "handicap").
bottom line: vaginas NEED physical competitions to be gender-based in order to excel. that is, in order to excel ALONGSIDE of men and never OVER men. from military requirements to the olympics - even to the "coney island hot dog eating competition," vaginas NEED separate (gender-based) divisions in order to win in any competition. if you build it, they will come - if you either keep 'em separated or give them LOTS and LOTS of mens' hormones, they will finish in first place. any vagina who takes man-hormones is the personification of "wannabee".
i refer to members of the little vagina-gender as "masculine wannabees," i call them "vaginas," i have no problem with pointing out their defects with as much offensive language as N-1-6-6-3-R-S use in their rap songs . how many female bodybuilders would be lackluster without hormone-injections? all of them? it's like the only thing that makes Strongwoman strong is a man's hormones. testosterone is the mark of a man, and with little vaginas relying on testosterone-injections to excel...well, that is why they are masculine wannabees. like "strong enough for a man but made for a woman" and earlier buzzphrases which tried to subjugate the superiority that masculinity has over femininity, the omnipresent-yet-unjustified buzzphrase of "a woman can do anything a man can do" is the latest fashion, the latest placebo meant to provide vaginas with a sense of worthiness and esteem. society just accepts it, but "a woman can do anything a man can do" is a lie and it's a placebo because there is nothing to justify it. it has no backbone and nothing to support it. also, there is something not right about a vagina who can't get a sense of esteem without being regarded as "manlike". identity-crisis, anyone? speaking of an identity-crisis,i will continue:
at least chastity bono's fabricated "pin the tail on the donkey" gender now conforms to the crisis of her mind's gender-identity not conforming to her actual gender...though she should have changed her mind rather than changing her gender's appearance. she could have changed her mind instead of her gender. it took time for her MIND to discover that she felt that she was in the wrong body, it took time for her MIND to refuse any sort of gender-acceptance and self-acceptance, it took time for the outside world and the genders around her to make her MIND feel that she was un-ladylike. one must LEARN that there are two genders, one must LEARN one's own place in the world regarding those genders. any gender-dysfunction that chastity bono felt had to be learned through living. chastity bono is not a mentally-sound person, she is weak because she abandoned self-love and self-esteem to mask her own misery by dwelling in 24/7 circus-sideshow.
let me get back to the masculine wannabees who DON'T play "pin the tail on the donkey".
it is my opinion that vaginas everywhere should be OFFENDED at other vaginas who are trying to measure-up to men, but instead they take pride in it. it is disrespect towards femininity for a vagina to think that she's nothing unless she's as strong as a man. from rose tennant on wpgb to fran drescher on reruns of "the nanny," i can't count how many times they've implied that either they're just as capable as men or that all vaginas "can do anything a man can do". quoth nanny fine, "i'm an independent, self-sufficient woman," as she figuratively pats herself on the head and tries to sell the viewing audience on seeing the disabled gender as capable. "anything a man can do," says rosie the riveter. if that's true, tell me why the difficulty of getting into the armed forces depends on gender...no man is going to become a soldier just by satisfying what is required of the little gender.
there is something not right about a vagina who can't get a sense of esteem without being regarded as "manlike," but there is something very wrong regarding a man who could not become a soldier because his stronger and more-capable presence existed on the stronger and more-capable gender. if we're going to compromise our national security out of pity for feelings of the lackluster, wannabee gender, why even bother going to war? we've already surrendered.
vaginas are not members of the superior gender, they are lesser. men have greater heights, broader shoulders, greater weights and greater appetites either for sex or for food. there is a reason that physical competitions are based on gender, it's because vaginas would serve as a handicap on a team of men. america's strongest womb (wombman, wombn, woman - are you getting the wombn and her baby-making namesake?) is either on hormones or testosterone and should not be accepted into the olympics on account of these gender-bending hormones.
dr. frank-n-furter is the only person who can make a man out of nothing (femininity = nothing). chastity bono may have the appearance of being manlike, but she should've changed her mind instead of conforming her body to the "help, i'm a man in a female's body" state of mind (or identity) that she had allowed to develop throughout her life. again, nobody is born into a "wrong" body - nobody is born with any opinions or feelings or knowledge of anything. it's just as easy for a skinny boy to grow up into the man of his dreams as it is for a skinny boy to regard himself as "not man enough" and to turn to homosexuality to find that big and strong man of his dreams that he's always wanted to be. wannabee. gay "men" lust for a masculine identity just as much as feminists do. they're all a bunch of masculine wannabees suffering from gender-identity issues, this is why i refer to gay males as masculivoids. males who use a man's body as a seeing-eye dog or as a touchy-feely sort of braille should not be regarded as men because sexual attraction is nothing but a gender-identity issue. what did the masculivoid say to the masculivoid? "duh, let's strip and inspect each other with all seven senses".
gay males should be regarded as "men" - with quotation marks used to signify the illegitimate masculine identity held by any male who feels a burning desire to inspect and study a naked man. it is mocking the integrity of masculine identity when a gay guy refers to himself as a man. gay males should realize their own masculine deficiencies, and feminists should embrace their lackluster masculine beings rather than mock femininity with the gender-identity issues which are apparent in the words "a woman can do anything a man can do".
this has been an introduction to my Womens' Movement. please join the movement at www.thelessergender.com and join the ladies who take pride in NOT being manlike.
mr. dylan terreri, i
dr. sheldon cooper, ii
"When I'm hungry, I eat. When I'm thirsty, I drink. When I feel like saying something, I say it." - Madonna
check out my site, www.jaggedlittledyl.com
, unless you're there now