this is another letter of complaint from my website of (homo)sexual assault that is
"When I'm hungry, I eat. When I'm thirsty, I drink. When I feel like saying something, I say it." - Madonna
back to the menu
dear sir or vagina:

what makes female voters tick - and how does this relate to the homo and to the negro and to satan?

spite. it's what runs womens' lives, gays' lives, blacks' lives - minorities' lives. satan was a spiteful wannabee who was kicked out of heaven because he was angry that he was lesser than god - he was spiteful of the powerful. it was because of his spite for "the man," that satan threw a "pride parade" in god's face and was therefore kicked out of heaven.

spite for "the man" is ever-so present in feminists' lives. how many times have we heard anyone say "a woman can do anything a man can do," without providing real-world justification? you know, aside from gender-based athletics and gender-based lumberjack-competitions. aside from every physical contest that doesn't allow females to compete against the bigger/broader/taller/stronger gender?

spite for "the real man" is ever-so present in the lives of masculivoids (gay "men," or men in name only, or men who aren't man enough to satisfy their emotional desire for a man). how many times have we heard the homo saying to the straight man, "i'm more man than you'll ever be," with no real-world justification? if a straight man is man enough to satisfy his emotional desire for a man, is the gay masculivoid really more man than a straight man will ever be? in the immortal words of macaulay culkin, "iiiiiiiiiiiiii don't think so".

as a society, we are embracing the "wannabee" aspect of satan. we are legitimizing it with everything from feminism to "gay rights". satan mocks god in an "if you can't beat him, mock him" type of spiteful jealousy (ie, madonna mocking christ in her shows, illuminati "artists" mocking christ in their lyrics). little wombs mock the bigger/taller/stronger gender in the same jealous way, both in their words and even on tv (where men are portrayed as dimwitted and incapable morons). gay-bashing and/or mockery is considered a type of "thought crime," when straight-bashing and/or mockery is tolerated in the media and with words that gays use negatively ("breeder," for example). "white men can't jump," "white men have small cocks," "white men can't dance" - society and the media are mocking the white man and embracing the negro out of the same spite and jealousy for the accomplishments of members of the competent race who didn't rely on programs like "affirmative action" to get into college. would anyone dare to make a movie called "black men can't enunciate" or "black men can't stay out of jail" - how about "black men can't stop eating watermelon" - these titles would never be considered as anything but racist, but "white men can't jump" is harmless.

it is not hard to see why straight, white men are the targets of so much mockery. it's because heterosexuality is superior to homosexuality (not only because there is an actual purpose of heterosexuality, but because it's a self-esteem issue for a "man" to need another masculine presence - a masculine replacement - to feel complete). it's because men are superior (bigger, taller, stronger) physical presences who can accomplish more than their itty-bitty counterparts. it's because the abundance of blacks in jail is a reflection on blacks' characters. this is why straight, white men are the targets of mockery - because heterosexuality is more respectable than homosexuality, because men are more competent than women, because whites are more responsible than blacks. it all has to do with giving back to society - heterosexuals make children, men protect women, whites are more the inventors while blacks are just users.

mr. dylan terreri, i
dr. sheldon cooper, ii
"When I'm hungry, I eat. When I'm thirsty, I drink. When I feel like saying something, I say it." - Madonna

check out my site, , unless you're there now